We are the counter movement

As a shareholder, employee or homebuyer, you also become part of the countermovement against many negative developments in our society that are detrimental to our survival.

Many people have the feeling that there is a development in the wrong direction in many areas. We are more than just an innovative product, we are the countermovement.

As a shareholder, employee or homebuyer, you also become part of the countermovement against many negative developments in our society that are detrimental to our survival.

We are the counter movement
	Many people feel that there is a development in the wrong direction in many areas. We are more than only an innovative product, we are the countermovement.

Strictly against “Man Is a Pest”
	We vehemently disagree with this. Any direction that views man as a pest will be completely incapable of developing solutions for the survival of mankind.

For decades all the “Save Restrict Renounce” sermons
	We, on the other hand, believe that only worldwide wealth can provide the economic basis for a planet renovation, back to 350 ppm CO2.

Against “You will have nothing but be happy”
	We, on the other hand, want to make home ownership and energy ownership possible for a very large part of the population. Our own food production is also one of our important issues.

Irresponsible sectarians demand renunciation of children
	Children are our future! Renounce our future because of the delusions of a doomsday cult? Re-ruralization creates a family-friendly environment.

Since the beginning of the industrial revolution is urbanization running
	We think that the limits of urbanization have been reached and also already exceeded, a good part of the population should go back to the countryside, a re-ruralization.

The development of a parable

Any direction that views man as a pest will be completely incapable of developing solutions for the survival of mankind.

Look for example of this, perfect example: the protests against Tesla in Grünheide.

Let's look at the protests against the Tesla factory in Grünheide. Tesla's mission statement is "Accelerating the global transition to sustainable energy." What is there to protest about?

What were the electric cars before Tesla? At that time, the environmentalists came up with the City-El. A vehicle with 3 wheels for one person and about 80 km range and 65 km/h top speed. This electric vehicle found very few buyers.

Wow. CityEl versus Tesla, what more perfect example is there that you can't develop anything useful with the wrong philosophy?

Net zero emission or planentene cleanup back to 350 ppm.

Compared to the planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2, the net zero emission is something quite cutely small, but also something richly ineffective. It could be that in 20 years nature will not absorb 20 Gt CO2 per year, but perhaps already emits CO2 as the Amazon does today. How does one present the enormous additional effort compared to the net zero emission in a handy way? As it happens, both main actors of the parable have already entered the stage, now only the scenario is missing.

When Ms. Heidi Reiter was a member of the state parliament, she was annoyed that she could not charge her CityEl at Chimseehof, the seat of the Salzburg state government. According to Google Maps, it is only 12.1 km from Eugendorf to Chimseehof. So 24.2 km there and back. Nevertheless, it broke down once on the way home on the slight incline to Eugendorf with the CityEl, when it was around zero degrees. What would be there only at -36 °?

And already there is the perfect scenario for the parable:

Saving Restricting Renouncing for net zero emissions is like driving a CityEl 491 km from Oslo to Trondheim on a very cold December day. Would be guaranteed to break down on the first 30 km on the first slight incline. Planenten renovation, on the other hand, is like driving a Tesla S 1966 km from Oslo to Nordkapp.

Example "Parents for Future Waldviertel

"Parents for Future Waldviertel" just blocked me on Facebook. This clearly shows that these self-proclaimed pseudo-climate protectors hate nothing more than effective climate protection, where you can't bully people with "save, restrict, renounce" demands.

Home builder companies without will to survive

Since 2010, I have been advocating the concept of "Land for Energy", rededicating grassland around expensive cities to building land, but the lease must be paid in electricity. This could be 50 kWh per year per m² of building land. For this concept, I contacted several prefabricated house companies and the Association of Prefabricated House Manufacturers. They know the market is getting tighter, but no willingness to do anything new.

The Standard just wrote an obituary for the family home because of this.

In the case of cars, we can say: The combustion car is dead, long live the new electric car! In the case of single-family homes, we can say: The single-family home is dead, long live the new single-family home!

Become a shareholder from 200 €

A new shareholder said "I with my very modest investment", but 4,000 times 1,000 € is also 4 million for all investments until the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for worldwide expansion.

Only the Annual General Meeting can resolve the major capital increases, but here is what the Executive Board and Supervisory Board can resolve. The new capital stock is used to perfect the documents for the larger planned capital increases.

Here are the details.