Germany must not become North Korea“What is more important? The survival of democracy or the survival of humanity? Would a climate dictatorship be justified if it saved humanity?”
Memes are popping up on Twitter: “What's more important? The survival of democracy or the survival of humanity? Would a climate dictatorship be justified if it saved humanity?”. Since September 2020, Sarah Bosetti has been writing and hosting the format “Bosetti will reden!” for ZDFkultur. Were there calls for government-subsidized photovoltaic factories and battery factories? Of course not, just how to restrict people as much as possible. The great vision of state control like in North Korea.
With such gruesome visions, the first question that must be asked is, of course: What should a dictatorship be able to do better? The USA managed to invest 37% GNP in armaments during the time of World War 2. Enormous projects were pushed through: The B29 long-range bomber, the proximity fuse, penicillin and the atomic bomb. All essential components for winning and keeping one's own losses low. An enormous team effort by the people and the government. But what if all you have to offer the people are gruesome austerity-restriction-renunciation horror visions? Like the cynical “You will own nothing, but be happy”? This is the only way to even think of a dictatorship. Completely after the slogan “And are you not willing, then I need force!”.
Everything you do or even demand must be constantly evaluated. The parameters are constantly changing. If 60 years ago the large apartment block was much cheaper in terms of energy than the single-family house, this is completely reversed in the GEMINI next generation house. So-called “climate protectors” are however for decades not ready to evaluate their constant “saving restricting renouncing” demands. How big is the effect? How great is the willingness to participate? It is dogmatically held on to as the only beatifying method of one's own faith. If you believe in it strongly enough, you can even get an honorary doctorate in theology, like Greta Thunberg. After all, the idea of a dictatorship shows that, after so many decades, the question of “How great is the willingness to participate? After only an insignificant minority is willing to save, one wants to simply force the rest.
The worse a solution is, the more force is needed to implement it. The more violence needed, the more likely it is to fail. Great solutions need the cooperation of the population. Great solutions are only possible with the capitalism so despised by the so-called “climate protectors” possible. “Capitalism is good for the consumer because so many money-hungry capitalists are trying to capture market share with cheaper and better products.” This is how Tesla and BYD have managed to become the largest electric car manufacturers in the world. Of course, both have higher goals, but money is needed to make a company big. In the same way, I would like to make GEMINI next Generation AG the largest home manufacturer by 2045. Now some fan of dictatorship might cite China as an example. You couldn't be more wrong. In 2022, a worldwide opinion poll was conducted. Big surprise, the Chinese think they live in the most democratic state in the world. Why? Because the Chinese see the government on the side of the people. In the USA, on the other hand, you can choose between 2 parties. Both parties are on the side of big corporations, especially the defense industry. Here to a video where this is explained.
As of 2025, the first ClimateProtectionSuperiorityHouses will be available. As the Salzburg state election shows, “affordable housing” is a very powerful argument in elections. So then a party will include “Land for Energy” in its election program. Other parties will not be able to oppose it. 20 million such houses in Germany would be 1,000 GW photovoltaics, 3,000 GWh accumulators, 2/3 of a functioning energy turnaround.
As a shareholder, employee or homebuyer, you will also become part of the countermovement against many negative developments in our society that are detrimental to our survival. A new shareholder said “I with my very modest investment”, but 4,000 times 1,000 € is also 4 million for all investments until the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for worldwide expansion. Only the Annual General Meeting can resolve the major capital increases, but here is what the Executive Board and Supervisory Board can resolve. The new capital stock is used to perfect the documents for the larger planned capital increases. Here are the details. |
