Counter theses to central dogmas of the climate protectionists

Is there really only one way to 100 rrenewable energy? Is there really only one way to protect the climate? Is the target sufficient and achievable?

The lecture at the Upper Austrian Conference of Mayors on June 14, 2023, already had something of the 95 Theses at the church in Wittenberg about it: counter-theses to central questions of faith of the climate activists.
  • Global prosperity instead of saving Restricting Renouncing
  • Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 instead of net zero emissions and 1.5° target
  • An optimistic, motivated society instead of broken, motiveless people
  • Settlements with ClimateProtectionSuperiorityHouses instead of even more area for energy from plants
  • It also works with photovoltaics and electricity storage alone instead of extreme expansion of wind energy
  • New houses with very much power production instead of building shame
  • Family-friendly living instead of foregoing children for the climate
  • Home ownership instead of dense housing, cramming people together more and more

  No schism, but science against ideology and dogmas

The basis for a functional energy transition with a high level of acceptance among the population is the GEMINI next generation house. The richest 90 percent of the population should be able to afford one, at least in areas with low land prices. Each house contributes to the energy transition by selling electricity according to demand and 100 igen supply.

However, 1,000 or even 10,000 new houses are not enough for a functioning energy transition. Therefore, the 17 MWh electricity yield per hectare of a corn field for biogas was compared to the 850 MWh yield per hectare of a settlement with 16 houses.

The large central photovoltaic covers the access road, garages, parking spaces and areas for sports and leisure of residents.

Replacing only half of the current acreage for biofuel and biogas with such settlement structures would be about 2/3 of a workable energy transition.

The entrance to paradise for 16 families on one hectare. The acceptance of the population is a decisive criterion to be able to achieve 100 rrenewable energy.

In the vicinity of high-priced cities, the conversion of grassland into "land for energy" was proposed: lease price 600 MWh per year and hectare. Only houses certified according to the KlimaSchutzÜberlegenheitsHaus building standard may be placed there.

Create the environment to increase the birth rate on maintenance of the population.

  Finally treating the problem of climate change seriously and scientifically

There are clear criteria to evaluate problem solutions scientifically:
  • Sufficient goal setting
  • Acceptance of the population
  • Feasibility
In all criteria, the dogmas of climate activists fail miserably:
  • Net zero emission is not enough, we need planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm
  • Acceptance of the population is not there, but who would be against global prosperity?
  • Implementability, in addition the following parable:

  The Trondheim Hammerfest Parable

Very cold December days in Scandinavia. You can either take a CityEl from Oslo to Trondheim or a Tesla Y from Oslo to Hammerfest. The CityEl was a single-seat rolling waiver from the 1990s. The lead-acid battery, which is sensitive to cold, would give out after 30 km at the latest on the first uphill slope.

Here, Trondheim symbolizes the goal of net-zero emissions, and the CityEl stands for the doomed methods of achieving this goal.

Hammerfest stands here symbolically for the goal of planetary restoration. It is almost 4 times further away, but easily reached with the Tesla Y.

  EEG sabotages market-based energy transition

The current model of a market-based energy transition is the day-ahead spot market with its hourly prices. At 14:00 is the fixing, at which time the prices for each hour of the next day are published.

Supply and demand determine the price, and everything would be fine and free-market if there were not a market participant who was legally obliged to behave uneconomically: According to the law, electricity from EEG plants must be offered at any price. Every price also means negative prices. The difference between the EEG price and the market price was paid by the electricity customer until 2022. From 2022, this must be paid by the taxpayer.

  Communist planned economy: giant matches

In the days of the communist Eastern Bloc, there was a planned economy. Production targets were often solved in a very original way: "Production must be increased from 10 tons to 20 tons of matches in the new five-year plan. Solution: produce matches twice as heavy, because this was easier than producing twice as much. Exactly such an ineffectual production specification is the EEG.

  Today 7 hours no feed possible

There are providers like where you can buy and sell electricity at the day-ahead spot market price. There is however a service fee, which comes with the purchase on top and is deducted with the sales. Thus, today there are 7 hours when you can not sell electricity. This phenomenon currently occurs on weekends and holidays. But in 2024 Germany will have 80 GW of photovoltaics and in 2025 90 GW. Negative prices will also occur on working days.

There is no discussion whatsoever in Germany about reforming this madness. You'll probably be called a right-wing radical if you say, "The sun doesn't shine at night.

  The difference between association member and shareholder

A club member donates his membership fee to the club and is happy if the club is successful. If not, I have supported a good cause.

A shareholder acquires shares in a stock corporation. If the AG is successful, his shares are worth much more. In the case of GEMINI next Generation AG, his reward for supporting a good cause.

As a shareholder, employee or homebuyer, you will also become part of the countermovement against many negative developments in our society that are detrimental to our survival.

A new shareholder said "I with my very modest investment", but 4,000 times 1,000 € is also 4 million for all investments until the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for worldwide expansion.

Only the Annual General Meeting can resolve the major capital increases, but here is what the Executive Board and Supervisory Board can resolve. The new capital stock is used to perfect the documents for the larger planned capital increases.

Here are the details.
          Counter theses to central dogmas of the climate protectionists: Is there really only one way to 100 rrenewable energy? Is there really only one way to protect the climate? Is the target sufficient and achievable?