Science was leveraged
Was criticism of Lyssenko's socialist biology possible under Stalin? Is criticism of the storage-less energy transition possible among uneducated green dogmatists?
Science means a constant search for the truth. Theories are tested with ever better technology and ever better methods. Theories are developed only to be disproved or to be recognized as the new state of science.
Every time this process is interrupted, it leads to disaster. Thus, Lyssenko invented a socialist biology. This was against all scientific knowledge of that time. But if you win the friendship of Stalin, then it is the only unassailable scientific truth in Stalin's sphere of power.
Lyssenko was responsible for many millions of deaths from starvation. For many executed peasants who were forced to cultivate according to the Lyssenko method and then sentenced to death for sabotage after crop failures.
The limitist theory of an energy transition without electricity storage is as stupid as the socialist biology under Lyssenko. Limitism is an ideology that regards "saving restricting renouncing" as the sole solution to all problems.
The German photovoltaic industry was only destroyed in 2013. Regarding the lobby work 70 GW expansion target one can only say: Whoever has such a lobby does not need any more enemies.
But this work of destruction was not enough: In 2014, there was already the next blow against a functional energy transition:
Criticism of the nonsense? On the contrary, if one wants to be successful in the pseudo-scientific business, one must ingratiate oneself to such nonsense. As the summit of the ingratiation to the nonsense, the Fraunhofer Institute made a study about an almost storage-less power system in the year 2050.
Here is an excerpt from a discussion in the Facebook group Energiewirtschaft Deutschland.
Roland Mösl I was responsible for planning power plants, especially coal-fired power plants, for many years. It is true that the units are not capable of fast starts. Today, the load change speeds, the rotating masses, the storage capacity of the steam generators and - if it has to go fast - measures like bypassing the preheating lines compensate for the volatilities of wind power and PV. See below for a picture.
Peter Preusser These are all efficiency-reducing measures that are only necessary because the EEG morons forgot about the batteries. Please describe the efficiencies and additional wear caused by such measures.
Roland Mösl All of this and also the fact that the power plants have to be kept ready / operated at minimum load and thus contribute to negative prices is, as you say, the fault of those who did not think that the storage facilities were necessary until now, in the first place Patrick Graichen as recently as 2014.
What are the main criticisms of the energy transition? Flutter power and the standby operation of calorific power plants to compensate for forecast errors for wind energy. All problems because no batteries were wanted in the energy transition. Graichen even became state secretary in the traffic light coalition. His reason for resigning is also symptomatic of the system: the unscientific nonsense of the energy transition without storage was not the reason for his resignation.
Twice all my postings were deleted and I was mobbed in the Photovoltaikforum.com: I posted about the necessary accumulators for a functional energy transition. I thought experts would discuss there, but far from it, they had internalized the storage-less energy transition in such a way that they saw any criticism of it as a serious attack on their personality.
Similarly in many other discussions. Many opinion leaders have been guilty of perpetuating completely unscientific claims.
What future prospects can be named for today's children? The majority of society has only extremely negative views of the future. This applies to housing alone, a central need of every human being. The search query "housing Germany" brings only disaster reports in the search results. The problems are not to be mastered with conventional methods any longer. Completely new ways of thinking are needed.
If you support these completely new ways of thinking by buying shares, then in a few years you will not only be able to say "I contributed to this", but you will probably also be able to look forward to a considerable increase in the value of these shares.
A club member donates his membership fee to the club and is happy if the club is successful. If not, I have supported a good cause.
A shareholder acquires shares in a stock corporation. If the AG is successful, his shares are worth much more. In the case of GEMINI next Generation AG, his reward for supporting a good cause.
As a shareholder, employee or homebuyer, you will also become part of the countermovement against many negative developments in our society that are detrimental to our survival.
A new shareholder said "I with my very modest investment", but 4,000 times 1,000 € is also 4 million for all investments until the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for worldwide expansion.
Only the Annual General Meeting can resolve the major capital increases, but here is what the Executive Board and Supervisory Board can resolve. The new capital stock is used to perfect the documents for the larger planned capital increases.
Since the last newsletter, there are 5 new shareholders and €15,800 more in the escrow account for the capital increase. There is a reward program for recommending the share. Two of the new shareholders have become so through this reward program.
Here are the details.